OSEBX1 945,09+0,00 %
EQNR349,90+0,00 %
DNB281,10+0,00 %
MOWI202,20+0,00 %
Brent$101,96+0,68 %
Gold$4 714,70+0,43 %
USD/NOK9,3029+0,03 %
EUR/NOK10,9325+0,06 %
SPX7 365,12+1,46 %
NDX28 599,17+2,08 %
MARKETS CLOSED · LAST TRADE Thu 03:14 UTC
QEM57

QEM Ltd

UraniumVerified
Score breakdown
Sentiment+30Risk penalty-3Missing signals-3
Quality breakdown
Key fields100Profile38Conclusion98AI synthesis40Observations3

QEM's capital structure is characterized by a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01, indicating minimal leverage and a strong equity base of $2.83 million. The company's liquidity position is reflected in a current ratio of 5.16, suggesting it has sufficient short-term assets to cover its liabilities. However, the company reported negative operating and free cash flows of -$2.91 million and -$3.05 million, respectively, indicating ongoing cash burn [doc:HA-latest]. Profitability metrics show significant underperformance relative to industry norms. The company reported a return on equity (ROE) of -1.14 and a return on assets (ROA) of -0.95, both of which are negative and far below the typical thresholds for a healthy mining operation. These figures suggest that QEM is not generating returns from its assets or equity, which is a concern for investors [doc:HA-latest]. QEM's revenue is entirely derived from its Julia Creek Project, which is its only disclosed segment. The company does not provide geographic revenue breakdowns, but the project is located in North Western Queensland, Australia. This concentration in a single geographic and operational segment increases the company's exposure to local regulatory, environmental, and market risks [doc:QEM-2023-10-K]. The company's growth trajectory is currently negative, with a reported revenue of $19.63 million in the latest period. Given the negative operating and free cash flows, it is unlikely that QEM will achieve significant revenue growth in the near term without external financing or a material discovery at the Julia Creek Project. The company's outlook for the current and next fiscal years is constrained by its operational performance and capital structure [doc:HA-latest]. Risk factors for QEM include its negative cash flows and the potential for dilution if the company raises additional capital. The risk assessment indicates a medium liquidity risk due to the company's negative net cash position after subtracting total debt. While the dilution risk is currently low, the company may need to issue new shares to fund operations, which could dilute existing shareholders' equity [doc:HA-latest]. Recent events include the company's continued exploration activities at the Julia Creek Project, with no material discoveries reported in the latest financial period. The company has not disclosed any significant regulatory or legal issues, but its reliance on a single project and the absence of revenue-generating operations remain key concerns for investors [doc:QEM-2023-10-K].

Profile
CompanyQEM Ltd
TickerQEM.AX
SectorEnergy
BusinessUranium
Industry groupUranium
IndustryUranium
AI analysis

Business. QEM Limited is an Australia-based mineral exploration company focused on the exploration and development of its flagship Julia Creek Project, which includes vanadium and energy resources [doc:QEM-2023-10-K].

Classification. QEM is classified under the Energy economic sector, Uranium business sector, and Uranium industry with a confidence level of 0.92 [doc:verified-market-data].

QEM's capital structure is characterized by a low debt-to-equity ratio of 0.01, indicating minimal leverage and a strong equity base of $2.83 million. The company's liquidity position is reflected in a current ratio of 5.16, suggesting it has sufficient short-term assets to cover its liabilities. However, the company reported negative operating and free cash flows of -$2.91 million and -$3.05 million, respectively, indicating ongoing cash burn [doc:HA-latest]. Profitability metrics show significant underperformance relative to industry norms. The company reported a return on equity (ROE) of -1.14 and a return on assets (ROA) of -0.95, both of which are negative and far below the typical thresholds for a healthy mining operation. These figures suggest that QEM is not generating returns from its assets or equity, which is a concern for investors [doc:HA-latest]. QEM's revenue is entirely derived from its Julia Creek Project, which is its only disclosed segment. The company does not provide geographic revenue breakdowns, but the project is located in North Western Queensland, Australia. This concentration in a single geographic and operational segment increases the company's exposure to local regulatory, environmental, and market risks [doc:QEM-2023-10-K]. The company's growth trajectory is currently negative, with a reported revenue of $19.63 million in the latest period. Given the negative operating and free cash flows, it is unlikely that QEM will achieve significant revenue growth in the near term without external financing or a material discovery at the Julia Creek Project. The company's outlook for the current and next fiscal years is constrained by its operational performance and capital structure [doc:HA-latest]. Risk factors for QEM include its negative cash flows and the potential for dilution if the company raises additional capital. The risk assessment indicates a medium liquidity risk due to the company's negative net cash position after subtracting total debt. While the dilution risk is currently low, the company may need to issue new shares to fund operations, which could dilute existing shareholders' equity [doc:HA-latest]. Recent events include the company's continued exploration activities at the Julia Creek Project, with no material discoveries reported in the latest financial period. The company has not disclosed any significant regulatory or legal issues, but its reliance on a single project and the absence of revenue-generating operations remain key concerns for investors [doc:QEM-2023-10-K].
Key takeaways
  • QEM has a strong equity base but is experiencing negative cash flows and poor profitability.
  • The company's reliance on a single project and geographic location increases its operational and regulatory risk.
  • The low debt-to-equity ratio and high current ratio suggest a relatively stable capital structure.
  • The company's growth prospects are limited without a material discovery or external financing.
  • Investors should monitor the company's exploration progress and capital-raising activities closely.
  • --
  • ## RATIONALES
  • ```json
Financial snapshot
PeriodHA-latest
CurrencyAUD
Revenue$19.6k
Gross profit
Operating income-$3.5M
Net income-$3.2M
R&D
SG&A
D&A
SBC
Operating cash flow-$2.9M
CapEx-$13.5k
Free cash flow-$3.1M
Total assets$3.4M
Total liabilities$566.9k
Total equity$2.8M
Cash & equivalents
Long-term debt$37.2k
Annual history (last 5)
PeriodRevenueOp IncomeNet IncomeFCF
FY0$19.6k-$3.5M-$3.2M-$3.1M
FY-1$14.8k-$4.9M-$2.0M-$1.8M
FY-2$12.9k-$5.0M-$4.6M-$4.9M
FY-3$256.8k-$2.8M-$2.8M-$3.4M
FY-4$339.3k-$1.4M-$1.4M-$1.3M
PeriodGross %Op %Net %FCF %
FY0
FY-1
FY-2
FY-3
FY-4
PeriodAssetsEquityCashDebt
FY0$3.4M$2.8M
FY-1$2.3M$1.6M
FY-2$3.4M$2.7M
FY-3$2.6M$1.8M
FY-4$1.4M$1.1M
PeriodOCFCapExFCFSBC
FY0-$2.9M-$13.5k-$3.1M
FY-1-$4.0M-$35.8k-$1.8M
FY-2-$3.5M-$608.7k-$4.9M
FY-3-$2.7M-$684.5k-$3.4M
FY-4-$1.2M-$1.3M
Quarterly history (last 4)
PeriodRevenueOp IncomeNet IncomeFCF
FQ0
FQ-1
FQ-2
FQ-3
FQ-4
FQ-5
FQ-6
FQ-7
PeriodGross %Op %Net %FCF %
FQ0
FQ-1
FQ-2
FQ-3
FQ-4
FQ-5
FQ-6
FQ-7
PeriodAssetsEquityCashDebt
FQ0
FQ-1
FQ-2
FQ-3
FQ-4
FQ-5
FQ-6
FQ-7
PeriodOCFCapExFCFSBC
FQ0
FQ-1
FQ-2
FQ-3
FQ-4
FQ-5
FQ-6
FQ-7
Valuation
Market price
Market cap
Enterprise value
P/E
Reported non-GAAP P/E
EV/Revenue
EV/Op income
EV/OCF
P/B
P/Tangible book
Tangible book$2.8M
Net cash-$37.2k
Current ratio5.2
Debt/Equity0.0
ROA-95.1%
ROE-1.1%
Cash conversion90.0%
CapEx/Revenue-68.7%
SBC/Revenue
Asset intensity
Dilution ratio0.0%
Risk assessment
Dilution riskLow
Liquidity riskMedium
  • Net cash is negative after subtracting total debt.
Industry benchmarks
Activity: Uranium · cohort 1 companies
MetricQEMActivity
Op margin-17664.0%11.2% medp25 11.2% · p75 11.2%bottom quartile
Net margin-16458.6%17.3% medp25 17.3% · p75 17.3%bottom quartile
Gross margin49.6% medp25 49.6% · p75 49.6%
R&D / revenue3.8% medp25 3.8% · p75 3.8%
CapEx / revenue-68.7%4.4% medp25 4.4% · p75 4.4%bottom quartile
Debt / equity1.0%0.0% medp25 0.0% · p75 1.4%above median
Source data
Underlying data the analysis-pipeline pulls and audits. Fetch timestamps + content hashes show when each source was last refreshed.
Company fundamentalsperiod FQ-7 · history via verified-market-data
no public URL
2026-05-05 02:32 UTC#97fe539a
Source: analysis-pipeline (hybrid)Generated: 2026-05-05 02:34 UTCJob: 2e5695ae