A debate in Svenska Dagbladet challenges the strategic value of landmines in Sweden's defense posture, arguing that they create a false sense of security.
The authors contend that while mines can delay an advance, they rarely stop a qualified opponent or determine the outcome of a war.
Instead, a credible defense requires a comprehensive arsenal and active capabilities, not just static obstacles.
The commentary serves as a final reply in an ongoing discussion about Sweden's military preparedness.
The authors, including Stefan Forss, Karlis Neretnieks, and Patrik Oksanen, push back against claims that Sweden's security depends on specific weapon types like landmines.
They argue that the focus should be on overall combat effectiveness and adaptability rather than relying on terrain-denial tactics that may be bypassed by modern forces.